stablecoin have seen explosive increase inside the ultimate four years, increasing from a $17.6 billion marketplace capitalization to $170.6 billion. The number of holders has additionally skyrocketed from 3.78 million to 119.72 million. However, this increase brings critical questions. How safe is it to maintain stablecoins? How secure are the property backing stablecoins? Could stablecoins pose a hazard to conventional banking systems, and the way would possibly governments react to such competition?
what is money?
Money = value. When a person buys a chocolate bar, they exchange money for that value. The merchant can then use the money to obtain the value they need in return.
Money hasn’t always existed in the form of paper bills or digital currencies. In ancient times, people used cattle, leather, mollusks, wheat, and salt as mediums of exchange. Eventually, societies shifted to gold as a more standardized form of value. But imagine going to the store and buying a chocolate bar for the price of 0.0353 ounces (1 gram) of gold. This would require scales, cutting tools, and is simply not convenient.
So, the government created a model that worked this way: The government takes your gold in exchange it gives you money depending on the exchange rate. It was the Gold Standard, which happened first in England in 1816. In time, the government changed the model now they were printing money without anything backing it, which is where we are now.
The trust model
The evolution from tangible fee to paper money brought a key issue: agree with. Initially, people trusted the inherent cost of a commodity like gold. Today, accept as true with has shifted from some thing (gold) to a person (the authorities or vital authority). Trust forms the premise of modern-day foreign money systems. Without accept as true with, alternate could be impossible. For example, no one might promote a house for a bag of rocks due to the fact rocks keep no time-honored consider or cost.
Modern money, whether paper or virtual, holds value best because of collective consider within the government or the primary organization at the back of it. Without this agree with, cash could revert to being worthless portions of cotton and linen.
What is fiat money?
The term “fiat” refers to a decree or order issued via someone in authority. When it comes to fiat money, its cost stems no longer from any intrinsic belongings or commodity backing but from the government’s assertion that it holds price. In easy terms, cash has cost because the government says so.
Cons of fiat money
several problems plague traditional money systems. First, paper currency can become worthless overnight due to governmental decisions. Second, the stability of money varies widely between countries. Inflation affects all currencies, but some experience it more severely, leading to rapid devaluation and loss of purchasing power.
But digital fiat money introduces its own set of issues. Banks operate on a fractional reserve system, meaning they hold only a portion of customer deposits in reserve. Laws and regulations, such as the Basel Accords and national banking laws, permit banks to lend out the majority of deposited funds. This practice transforms money into mere numbers on a ledger, essentially IOUs, without full backing.
The fractional reserve system also brings the risk of a bank run, where a large number of customers withdraw their funds at once due to fears about the bank’s solvency. Since banks do not hold all deposits in reserve, they often cannot meet the sudden demand for cash, which leads to panic and potential bank failure.
Stablecoins operate on a different level from traditional fiat money but are not entirely immune to these issues either. Unlike fiat currencies, stablecoins like USDT, USDC, and DAI aim to maintain a stable value by being pegged to a fiat currency, usually the U.S. dollar.
Why are the majority of stablecoins pegged to USD?
Before understanding how stablecoins differ from traditional fiat money, we need to explore why the U.S. dollar holds such a dominant position. Why not the Swiss Franc or the Japanese Yen? Many would respond that the dollar is simply used everywhere, but the real question is why it became the world’s dominant currency in the first place.
The U.S. dollar’s dominance is due to its “exorbitant privilege.” As long as the dollar remains the world’s reserve currency, the United States avoids balance of payment crises. Through mechanisms like the Petrodollar system and the forced purchase of the U.S. Treasuries by foreign central banks, the U.S. could borrow cheaply and spend without immediate consequence.
The system allows the U.S. to print dollars and use them to buy real goods and services globally, exporting the inflation created to other countries. This is one reason developing nations often suffer from higher inflation—they absorb the inflationary effects of American monetary policy. In essence, the U.S. has a unique advantage in the global economy, trading printed money for tangible goods without immediately facing inflationary pressures domestically.
The Federal Reserve lowers interest rates or engages in quantitative easing to inject new dollars into the economy. Such actions increase the total supply of dollars circulating globally. U.S. governments, corporations, and banks benefit from the system by accessing cheaper credit, which leads to the creation of more dollars as loans are issued. Newly minted dollars are used to import goods from abroad, further pushing dollars into foreign economies.
Once foreign countries accumulate dollars, they face a critical choice. They can allow their own currency to appreciate against the dollar, but doing so would harm their export competitiveness. Alternatively, they can print more of their own currency to maintain its value relative to the dollar. However, this approach often leads to domestic inflation, creating a cycle in which foreign central banks must balance the value of their currency against the effects of inflation.
The U.S. benefits enormously from the global arrangement. When foreign countries accumulate dollars, they frequently invest them in U.S. Treasuries, which effectively lend money to government at low interest rates. The process helps the U.S. finance its deficit spending on war, infrastructure, and social programs. The U.S. can sustain such expenditures because foreign nations continue to buy its debt, driven by their need to hold dollars for trade and financial stability.
Pingback: Binance CEO Richard Teng’s Fireside Chat on Binance Square: Market Volatility and India’s Regulatory Milestone -